-99.4%
HCWB vs VOO
+80.9%
-180.2%
-99.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.4% | -0.4% | +2.8% | +2.6% |
| 7D | -14.3% | +0.1% | -14.4% | -14.4% |
| 30D | -14.3% | +0.1% | -14.3% | -14.3% |
| 3M | -69.9% | +2.0% | -72.0% | -70.1% |
| 6M | -25.4% | +13.0% | -38.5% | -29.8% |
| YTD | -49.5% | +13.6% | -63.1% | -52.5% |
| 1Y | -89.4% | +20.1% | -109.5% | -90.1% |
| All | -99.4% | +80.9% | -180.2% | -99.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling