+211.6%
HAS vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+311.6%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +2.6% | -0.9% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +9.1% | -6.9% | +2.1% |
| 30D | +29.6% | -37.1% | +66.7% | +29.7% |
| 3M | +30.3% | -53.7% | +84.0% | +30.5% |
| 6M | +25.6% | -99.7% | +125.3% | +30.5% |
| YTD | +50.8% | -99.9% | +150.7% | +57.5% |
| 1Y | +63.0% | -99.9% | +162.9% | +70.8% |
| 3Y | +211.6% | -100.0% | +311.6% | +222.8% |
| All | +211.6% | -100.0% | +311.6% | +222.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling