+44.2%
HAS vs PFGC
+60.5%
-16.3%
-40.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -0.5% | 0.0% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -2.2% | +0.4% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -11.9% | +14.2% | +5.9% |
| 3M | +10.4% | +5.0% | +5.4% | +8.7% |
| 6M | -3.2% | +8.6% | -11.8% | -5.9% |
| YTD | +15.4% | +9.7% | +5.7% | +10.8% |
| 1Y | +18.8% | -6.3% | +25.1% | +20.6% |
| All | +44.2% | +60.5% | -16.3% | +2.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling