+189.2%
HAS vs NIO
-59.9%
+249.1%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | +5.9% | -6.5% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -0.2% | +5.6% | -5.8% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +31.0% | -4.2% | +35.3% | +31.4% |
| 3M | +30.7% | -26.3% | +57.0% | +33.8% |
| 6M | +23.9% | -42.5% | +66.4% | +29.4% |
| YTD | +48.3% | -33.5% | +81.8% | +52.1% |
| 1Y | +60.2% | -52.7% | +112.9% | +69.5% |
| 3Y | +189.2% | -57.5% | +246.7% | +206.7% |
| All | +189.2% | -59.9% | +249.1% | +206.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling