+190.7%
HAS vs LDOS
+35.4%
+155.4%
-28.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | +0.1% | -1.8% | -1.7% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -3.7% | +3.7% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +31.3% | +16.4% | +14.9% | +27.8% |
| 3M | +32.1% | +7.4% | +24.7% | +30.1% |
| 6M | +28.1% | -0.3% | +28.5% | +28.2% |
| YTD | +49.1% | -24.0% | +73.1% | +56.4% |
| 1Y | +60.5% | -29.6% | +90.1% | +71.5% |
| All | +190.7% | +35.4% | +155.4% | +126.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling