+205.8%
HALO vs UMAC
+473.8%
-268.0%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -2.5% | +2.7% | +0.2% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -3.4% | +0.7% | -2.7% |
| 30D | +5.3% | -15.1% | +20.4% | +5.4% |
| 3M | +51.6% | -10.8% | +62.3% | +51.4% |
| 6M | +61.3% | +15.7% | +45.6% | +59.7% |
| YTD | +59.3% | +80.1% | -20.9% | +56.2% |
| 1Y | +38.3% | +116.7% | -78.4% | +34.7% |
| All | +205.8% | +473.8% | -268.0% | +170.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling