+167.4%
HALO vs NIO
-60.1%
+227.5%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -4.9% | +4.5% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -3.2% | -14.5% | +11.2% | -2.6% |
| 30D | -14.2% | -15.0% | +0.8% | -13.6% |
| 3M | -0.4% | -35.6% | +35.2% | +1.6% |
| 6M | +43.2% | -55.7% | +98.8% | +48.3% |
| YTD | +49.0% | -43.1% | +92.1% | +52.2% |
| 1Y | +40.8% | -53.5% | +94.4% | +45.0% |
| 3Y | +167.4% | -59.8% | +227.2% | +178.7% |
| All | +167.4% | -60.1% | +227.5% | +178.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling