+212.2%
GWW vs FLNC
-70.4%
+282.6%
-24.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | +2.5% | -1.8% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -3.4% | -4.1% | +0.7% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -24.8% | +22.9% | -0.7% |
| 3M | -2.4% | -59.1% | +56.7% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +15.7% | -42.0% | +57.7% | +16.5% |
| YTD | +27.6% | -49.8% | +77.4% | +28.4% |
| 1Y | +27.2% | +43.1% | -15.9% | +19.3% |
| 3Y | +89.7% | -61.0% | +150.6% | +82.9% |
| All | +212.2% | -70.4% | +282.6% | +201.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling