+52.9%
GTLB vs UMAC
-6.5%
+59.4%
-14.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -6.4% | +4.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -6.6% | +3.3% | -9.8% | -6.8% |
| 30D | +13.7% | -10.4% | +24.1% | +14.4% |
| 3M | +52.9% | +1.8% | +51.1% | +56.3% |
| All | +52.9% | -6.5% | +59.4% | +56.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling