+116.5%
GTLB vs QID
+4.9%
+111.6%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | QID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.0% | +2.6% | -1.7% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -0.7% | -7.1% | +6.4% | -2.3% |
| 30D | -10.2% | +12.6% | -22.9% | -7.3% |
| 3M | +10.1% | +14.2% | -4.1% | +13.7% |
| 6M | +116.5% | +6.2% | +110.3% | +123.4% |
| All | +116.5% | +4.9% | +111.6% | +123.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside QID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus QID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × QID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded QID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling