-17.9%
GTLB vs PLTU
+154.0%
-171.9%
-73.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -9.0% | +10.1% | +2.6% |
| 7D | +11.1% | -13.6% | +24.6% | +13.2% |
| 30D | +37.8% | +16.7% | +21.1% | +32.9% |
| 3M | +61.6% | +29.6% | +32.0% | +48.1% |
| 6M | +98.9% | -0.1% | +99.0% | +88.6% |
| YTD | +32.8% | -31.5% | +64.3% | +31.5% |
| 1Y | +14.7% | -19.7% | +34.4% | +8.3% |
| All | -17.9% | +154.0% | -171.9% | -45.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling