+98.9%
GTLB vs PENG
+170.4%
-71.5%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | +6.4% | -5.4% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +11.1% | +4.5% | +6.5% | +11.2% |
| 30D | +37.8% | -7.1% | +44.9% | +37.5% |
| 3M | +61.6% | -27.3% | +88.8% | +61.4% |
| 6M | +98.9% | +169.6% | -70.7% | +70.0% |
| All | +98.9% | +170.4% | -71.5% | +70.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling