+84.6%
GTLB vs M
+28.8%
+55.8%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | M | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.4% | -0.9% | +2.3% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -9.6% | -3.3% | -6.3% | -9.1% |
| 30D | -15.5% | +8.1% | -23.6% | -16.0% |
| 3M | +12.4% | +2.2% | +10.2% | +12.4% |
| 6M | +84.6% | +35.1% | +49.4% | +80.9% |
| All | +84.6% | +28.8% | +55.8% | +80.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside M.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus M return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × M return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded M wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling