+104.0%
GTLB vs KRMN
-67.6%
+171.6%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -2.4% | +4.5% | +1.9% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -15.1% | +11.1% | -5.2% |
| 30D | +12.3% | -44.5% | +56.8% | +7.6% |
| 3M | +65.9% | -25.0% | +90.9% | +64.9% |
| 6M | +104.0% | -66.5% | +170.5% | +97.2% |
| All | +104.0% | -67.6% | +171.6% | +97.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling