+104.0%
GTLB vs FRSH
+41.8%
+62.2%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | FRSH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.1% | -0.5% | +2.6% | +2.5% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -11.2% | +7.1% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +12.3% | -0.8% | +13.2% | +12.3% |
| 3M | +65.9% | +26.4% | +39.5% | +31.0% |
| 6M | +104.0% | +48.4% | +55.6% | +35.9% |
| All | +104.0% | +41.8% | +62.2% | +35.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FRSH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FRSH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FRSH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FRSH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling