+88.5%
GTLB vs CPAY
+30.2%
+58.2%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | CPAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -0.2% | -1.5% | -1.6% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -2.5% | -4.1% | -5.3% |
| 30D | +13.7% | +1.3% | +12.4% | +13.4% |
| 3M | +52.9% | +13.5% | +39.4% | +44.1% |
| 6M | +88.5% | +24.7% | +63.8% | +78.4% |
| All | +88.5% | +30.2% | +58.2% | +78.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CPAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CPAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CPAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CPAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling