-12.1%
GTLB vs BLDR
-56.4%
+44.2%
-75.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -1.9% | +0.2% | -1.2% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -2.7% | -3.9% | -5.9% |
| 30D | +13.7% | -14.7% | +28.5% | +18.6% |
| 3M | +52.9% | -20.8% | +73.7% | +61.1% |
| 6M | +88.5% | -35.3% | +123.8% | +108.7% |
| YTD | +23.4% | -40.3% | +63.8% | +38.4% |
| 1Y | -3.8% | -56.3% | +52.5% | +20.4% |
| All | -12.1% | -56.4% | +44.2% | +0.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling