+98.9%
GTLB vs ARMK
+39.1%
+59.8%
-23.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.1% | -0.9% | +1.9% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +11.1% | -2.4% | +13.5% | +10.3% |
| 30D | +37.8% | 0.0% | +37.8% | +37.6% |
| 3M | +61.6% | +6.7% | +54.9% | +66.6% |
| 6M | +98.9% | +38.8% | +60.1% | +130.2% |
| All | +98.9% | +39.1% | +59.8% | +130.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling