+17.5%
GRMN vs NIO
-37.5%
+54.9%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -0.3% | -0.2% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -6.7% | +6.8% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -11.3% | -20.0% | +8.7% | -9.2% |
| 3M | +17.7% | -30.5% | +48.2% | +21.9% |
| 6M | +14.2% | -20.7% | +34.9% | +16.7% |
| YTD | +37.0% | -25.7% | +62.7% | +40.9% |
| All | +17.5% | -37.5% | +54.9% | +25.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling