+43.1%
GRMN vs NIO
-54.1%
+97.2%
-15.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.5% | +3.4% | +3.1% | +6.1% |
| 7D | +6.1% | -0.6% | +6.7% | +6.2% |
| 30D | +1.3% | -3.5% | +4.8% | +1.7% |
| 3M | -5.6% | -30.7% | +25.1% | -1.6% |
| 6M | +22.2% | -45.6% | +67.8% | +30.0% |
| YTD | +44.3% | -35.3% | +79.6% | +52.1% |
| 1Y | +43.1% | -53.9% | +97.0% | +57.2% |
| All | +43.1% | -54.1% | +97.2% | +57.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling