+155.8%
GRMN vs MTB
+106.3%
+49.5%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | +0.6% | -1.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.9% | +1.5% | -2.4% | -1.6% |
| 30D | +1.2% | +2.3% | -1.2% | +0.2% |
| 3M | -8.9% | -12.1% | +3.2% | -3.5% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +9.8% | +13.2% | +17.4% |
| YTD | +41.2% | +12.0% | +29.2% | +33.1% |
| 1Y | +47.5% | +22.0% | +25.5% | +33.5% |
| 3Y | +155.8% | +107.6% | +48.1% | +104.5% |
| All | +155.8% | +106.3% | +49.5% | +104.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling