-18.7%
GRAB vs NIO
-64.4%
+45.7%
-52.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.5% | -2.4% | -4.1% | -6.1% |
| 7D | -13.9% | -4.1% | -9.7% | -13.4% |
| 30D | -17.2% | -23.2% | +6.1% | -14.2% |
| 3M | -7.9% | -29.9% | +22.0% | -3.5% |
| 6M | -23.2% | -25.1% | +1.9% | -20.7% |
| YTD | -39.1% | -27.5% | -11.6% | -37.0% |
| 1Y | -42.5% | -41.1% | -1.5% | -39.1% |
| All | -18.7% | -64.4% | +45.7% | -10.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling