+122.8%
GNT vs VOO
+75.9%
+46.9%
-15.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.1% | -0.6% | -1.5% | -1.8% |
| 7D | -2.2% | -2.0% | -0.2% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -1.7% | +3.7% | +2.9% |
| 3M | +11.0% | +4.7% | +6.3% | +8.3% |
| 6M | +9.7% | +12.6% | -2.9% | +3.1% |
| YTD | +28.2% | +11.8% | +16.4% | +20.8% |
| 1Y | +41.0% | +17.5% | +23.5% | +29.8% |
| All | +122.8% | +75.9% | +46.9% | +64.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling