+61.5%
GNRC vs ZCMD
-100.0%
+161.5%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | -7.1% | +10.0% | +3.0% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -5.4% | +5.2% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -15.7% | -24.8% | +9.1% | -15.6% |
| 3M | -27.3% | -62.8% | +35.5% | -27.7% |
| 6M | -12.1% | -99.5% | +87.5% | -10.9% |
| YTD | +37.1% | -99.8% | +136.9% | +39.3% |
| 1Y | -0.5% | -99.9% | +99.4% | +1.4% |
| 3Y | +61.5% | -100.0% | +161.5% | +56.0% |
| All | +61.5% | -100.0% | +161.5% | +56.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling