+51.5%
GNRC vs UMAC
+473.8%
-422.3%
-47.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.9% | -2.5% | +5.4% | +3.0% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -3.4% | +3.2% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -15.7% | -15.1% | -0.6% | -15.3% |
| 3M | -27.3% | -10.8% | -16.6% | -27.5% |
| 6M | -12.1% | +15.7% | -27.7% | -14.3% |
| YTD | +37.1% | +80.1% | -43.0% | +30.5% |
| 1Y | -0.5% | +116.7% | -117.2% | -6.5% |
| All | +51.5% | +473.8% | -422.3% | +26.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling