+170.5%
GM vs SONY
+42.2%
+128.3%
-29.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | SONY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.6% | -2.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -2.7% | +0.2% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -1.1% | +1.5% | -2.6% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +6.1% | +13.0% | -6.9% | +3.4% |
| 6M | +15.0% | +11.2% | +3.8% | +12.0% |
| YTD | +6.0% | -6.6% | +12.6% | +7.1% |
| 1Y | +47.1% | -18.1% | +65.2% | +52.8% |
| 3Y | +170.5% | +42.1% | +128.4% | +142.0% |
| All | +170.5% | +42.2% | +128.3% | +142.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SONY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SONY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SONY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SONY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling