+47.1%
GM vs NTAP
+63.1%
-16.0%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +8.5% | -9.1% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +7.4% | -9.8% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -1.4% | +0.3% | -1.0% |
| 3M | +6.1% | +24.6% | -18.4% | +2.5% |
| 6M | +15.0% | +105.9% | -90.9% | -1.8% |
| YTD | +6.0% | +88.5% | -82.5% | -7.2% |
| 1Y | +47.1% | +62.1% | -15.0% | +30.6% |
| All | +47.1% | +63.1% | -16.0% | +30.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling