+47.1%
GM vs FERG
+1.0%
+46.1%
-16.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FERG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +0.7% | -1.3% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -2.6% | +0.1% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -8.9% | +7.8% | +1.5% |
| 3M | +6.1% | -2.0% | +8.2% | +6.3% |
| 6M | +15.0% | -3.2% | +18.2% | +15.2% |
| YTD | +6.0% | +1.5% | +4.5% | +6.1% |
| 1Y | +47.1% | +0.5% | +46.6% | +49.9% |
| All | +47.1% | +1.0% | +46.1% | +49.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FERG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FERG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FERG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FERG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling