+75.8%
GM vs ECHO
+262.7%
-186.9%
-59.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | +1.4% | -2.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -2.4% | +3.7% | -6.2% | -2.8% |
| 30D | -1.1% | +0.7% | -1.8% | -1.2% |
| 3M | +6.1% | -27.3% | +33.4% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +15.0% | -17.0% | +31.9% | +16.3% |
| YTD | +6.0% | -14.3% | +20.3% | +6.5% |
| 1Y | +47.1% | +20.9% | +26.2% | +42.4% |
| 3Y | +170.5% | +423.0% | -252.5% | +96.2% |
| All | +75.8% | +262.7% | -186.9% | +42.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling