-48.9%
GLXY vs PENG
+132.5%
-181.5%
-62.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.2% | +10.3% | +2.9% | +8.1% |
| 7D | +14.3% | +1.9% | +12.5% | +11.7% |
| 30D | -19.6% | -37.8% | +18.2% | -1.2% |
| 3M | -20.7% | -14.1% | -6.6% | -16.9% |
| 6M | -49.6% | +13.1% | -62.7% | -60.0% |
| YTD | -28.6% | +151.8% | -180.4% | -72.1% |
| All | -48.9% | +132.5% | -181.5% | -78.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling