-30.0%
GLXY vs LNT
+24.8%
-54.7%
-69.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +13.2% | +0.5% | +12.7% | +13.4% |
| 7D | +14.3% | -0.2% | +14.5% | +14.1% |
| 30D | -19.6% | +11.6% | -31.2% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -20.7% | +8.2% | -28.8% | -17.7% |
| 6M | -49.6% | +3.1% | -52.7% | -48.3% |
| YTD | -28.6% | +16.8% | -45.4% | -28.1% |
| 1Y | -48.0% | +11.6% | -59.7% | -46.7% |
| All | -30.0% | +24.8% | -54.7% | -29.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling