-51.5%
GLXY vs HTZ
-76.0%
+24.6%
-62.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | -6.1% | +1.2% | -3.3% |
| 7D | +16.9% | -14.0% | +30.9% | +21.5% |
| 30D | -23.0% | -19.8% | -3.2% | -19.7% |
| 3M | -28.0% | -45.0% | +17.0% | -17.3% |
| 6M | -51.6% | -73.2% | +21.6% | -31.2% |
| YTD | -32.1% | -70.0% | +37.9% | -9.9% |
| 1Y | -51.5% | -75.7% | +24.3% | -23.1% |
| All | -51.5% | -76.0% | +24.6% | -23.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling