+10.3%
GLXY vs FLNC
+80.4%
-70.1%
-60.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.0% | -8.3% | +1.3% | -4.7% |
| 7D | +4.5% | -4.2% | +8.7% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +28.8% | -20.0% | +48.8% | +37.0% |
| 3M | -23.0% | -56.9% | +33.8% | -4.2% |
| 6M | +17.0% | -35.5% | +52.5% | +25.1% |
| YTD | +12.5% | -48.8% | +61.3% | +28.5% |
| 1Y | -5.4% | +49.3% | -54.6% | -7.8% |
| All | +10.3% | +80.4% | -70.1% | +8.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling