+35.4%
GLW vs ZTS
-29.4%
+64.8%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +0.5% | -1.3% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +15.5% | +1.0% | +14.5% | +15.7% |
| 30D | -19.6% | +12.4% | -32.0% | -15.2% |
| 3M | -28.5% | +13.6% | -42.1% | -23.8% |
| 6M | -39.5% | +9.3% | -48.8% | -35.4% |
| YTD | +37.2% | -32.6% | +69.8% | +57.8% |
| 1Y | +35.4% | -30.0% | +65.5% | +56.0% |
| All | +35.4% | -29.4% | +64.8% | +56.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling