+421.2%
GLW vs WELL
+204.6%
+216.6%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | WELL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -2.1% | +7.7% | +6.0% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -0.8% | +4.6% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -0.1% | -1.3% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +18.0% | -39.8% | -25.5% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +15.0% | -8.1% | +2.8% |
| YTD | +77.2% | +28.6% | +48.5% | +65.4% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | +42.9% | +80.3% | +101.0% |
| All | +421.2% | +204.6% | +216.6% | +283.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside WELL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus WELL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × WELL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded WELL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling