-39.5%
GLW vs UMAC
-19.8%
-19.7%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -6.5% | +5.7% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +15.5% | +10.1% | +5.4% | +13.4% |
| 30D | -19.6% | -39.1% | +19.6% | -12.7% |
| 3M | -28.5% | -56.2% | +27.7% | -19.5% |
| 6M | -39.5% | -16.2% | -23.3% | -38.6% |
| All | -39.5% | -19.8% | -19.7% | -38.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling