+134.7%
GLW vs PSA
+4.9%
+129.9%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -2.3% | +3.8% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +16.9% | -2.2% | +19.1% | +17.1% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -9.6% | +16.5% | +7.9% |
| 3M | -3.0% | -7.9% | +4.9% | -3.0% |
| 6M | +31.0% | -2.0% | +33.0% | +23.0% |
| YTD | +93.4% | +15.7% | +77.7% | +87.1% |
| 1Y | +134.7% | +5.8% | +129.0% | +117.7% |
| All | +134.7% | +4.9% | +129.9% | +117.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling