+21.8%
GLW vs PENG
+88.9%
-67.1%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | +12.4% | -9.8% | -3.3% |
| 7D | -13.9% | -19.4% | +5.5% | -5.9% |
| 30D | -35.0% | -42.4% | +7.4% | -17.5% |
| 3M | -32.4% | -25.6% | -6.7% | -25.5% |
| 6M | -41.3% | +7.3% | -48.6% | -46.5% |
| YTD | +21.8% | +113.9% | -92.0% | -22.4% |
| 1Y | +21.8% | +93.6% | -71.7% | -18.6% |
| All | +21.8% | +88.9% | -67.1% | -18.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling