+6.9%
GLW vs PATH
+38.1%
-31.2%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PATH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -16.6% | +22.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -16.3% | +20.1% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +9.9% | -11.3% | +3.3% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +30.2% | -52.0% | -10.8% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +37.2% | -30.3% | +26.6% |
| All | +6.9% | +38.1% | -31.2% | +26.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PATH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PATH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PATH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PATH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling