+421.2%
GLW vs NXPI
+18.0%
+403.3%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXPI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | +1.3% | +4.4% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +1.9% | +1.9% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -1.4% | +0.1% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -21.8% | -29.1% | +7.2% | -9.6% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +6.2% | +0.7% | +7.2% |
| YTD | +77.2% | +5.9% | +71.3% | +76.8% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | +2.9% | +120.4% | +124.1% |
| All | +421.2% | +18.0% | +403.3% | +370.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXPI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXPI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXPI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXPI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling