+471.0%
GLW vs NTNX
+82.3%
+388.7%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +2.0% |
| 7D | +7.8% | -3.1% | +11.0% | +8.0% |
| 30D | -0.4% | +2.0% | -2.4% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -5.6% | +34.0% | -39.5% | -7.6% |
| 6M | +26.7% | +72.4% | -45.7% | +20.1% |
| YTD | +91.0% | +27.5% | +63.5% | +87.8% |
| 1Y | +122.4% | -18.7% | +141.1% | +134.6% |
| 3Y | +471.0% | +80.8% | +390.2% | +431.7% |
| All | +471.0% | +82.3% | +388.7% | +431.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling