+384.1%
GLW vs NBIX
+59.9%
+324.2%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NBIX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -0.2% | +2.2% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +7.8% | +0.4% | +7.5% | +7.8% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -0.2% | -0.3% | -0.4% |
| 3M | -5.6% | -4.0% | -1.6% | -5.3% |
| 6M | +26.7% | +20.6% | +6.1% | +21.3% |
| YTD | +91.0% | +10.1% | +80.9% | +85.7% |
| 1Y | +122.4% | +8.8% | +113.6% | +116.3% |
| 3Y | +471.0% | +42.5% | +428.5% | +414.6% |
| All | +384.1% | +59.9% | +324.2% | +308.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NBIX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NBIX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NBIX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NBIX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling