+478.1%
GLW vs MNDY
-52.8%
+530.8%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MNDY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -3.1% | +4.6% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +16.9% | -14.1% | +31.0% | +16.8% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -8.5% | +15.5% | +6.9% |
| 3M | -3.0% | -2.5% | -0.4% | -2.9% |
| 6M | +31.0% | +0.1% | +30.9% | +30.4% |
| YTD | +93.4% | -45.0% | +138.4% | +105.5% |
| 1Y | +134.7% | -58.1% | +192.9% | +157.9% |
| All | +478.1% | -52.8% | +530.8% | +520.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MNDY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MNDY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MNDY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MNDY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling