+38.2%
GLW vs LMT
+38.5%
-0.3%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LMT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.4% | +1.1% | +6.3% | +7.5% |
| 7D | +1.4% | +2.5% | -1.1% | +1.4% |
| 30D | -18.2% | +19.2% | -37.4% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -24.2% | +2.7% | -26.9% | -22.6% |
| 6M | -41.7% | +20.6% | -62.3% | -39.6% |
| YTD | +38.3% | +28.4% | +9.9% | +45.5% |
| 1Y | +38.2% | +36.9% | +1.3% | +44.7% |
| All | +38.2% | +38.5% | -0.3% | +44.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LMT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LMT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LMT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LMT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling