+147.1%
GLW vs FIG
-71.6%
+218.7%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FIG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -4.4% | +10.0% | +5.2% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -16.3% | +20.1% | +1.8% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -14.3% | +13.0% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +7.2% | -29.0% | -19.4% |
| 6M | +6.9% | -18.6% | +25.5% | +11.3% |
| YTD | +77.2% | -35.5% | +112.6% | +88.3% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | -55.8% | +179.0% | +142.9% |
| All | +147.1% | -71.6% | +218.7% | +164.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling