+429.3%
GLW vs FBTC
+65.3%
+364.0%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | -2.5% | +8.2% | +6.2% |
| 7D | +3.8% | +2.9% | +0.8% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +23.0% | -24.4% | -5.5% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +25.6% | -47.4% | -25.3% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +9.0% | -2.1% | +4.8% |
| YTD | +77.2% | -8.9% | +86.1% | +77.4% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | -27.5% | +150.8% | +130.9% |
| All | +429.3% | +65.3% | +364.0% | +389.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling