+410.2%
GLW vs EXPD
+68.7%
+341.5%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EXPD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.7% | +0.9% | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| 7D | +3.8% | -1.1% | +4.9% | +4.0% |
| 30D | -1.3% | +4.1% | -5.4% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -21.8% | +17.9% | -39.7% | -24.1% |
| 6M | +6.9% | +29.2% | -22.3% | +1.7% |
| YTD | +77.2% | +27.4% | +49.8% | +67.9% |
| 1Y | +123.2% | +56.8% | +66.4% | +100.3% |
| All | +410.2% | +68.7% | +341.5% | +333.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EXPD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EXPD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EXPD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EXPD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling