+32.1%
GLW vs ECHO
+36.9%
-4.8%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.3% | +6.9% | +2.3% | +6.4% |
| 7D | -5.9% | +3.0% | -8.9% | -6.7% |
| 30D | -26.0% | +6.7% | -32.7% | -27.6% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +12.4% | -42.3% | -32.5% |
| 6M | -37.8% | -20.4% | -17.3% | -36.2% |
| YTD | +33.1% | -6.9% | +40.0% | +27.9% |
| All | +32.1% | +36.9% | -4.8% | +13.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling