+478.1%
GLW vs EBAY
+148.9%
+329.1%
-51.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | EBAY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.0% | +2.5% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +16.9% | -3.0% | +19.9% | +17.1% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -3.6% | +10.6% | +7.2% |
| 3M | -3.0% | -4.4% | +1.5% | -2.9% |
| 6M | +31.0% | +12.1% | +18.9% | +27.9% |
| YTD | +93.4% | +19.9% | +73.5% | +86.8% |
| 1Y | +134.7% | +13.4% | +121.4% | +127.4% |
| All | +478.1% | +148.9% | +329.1% | +356.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EBAY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EBAY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EBAY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EBAY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling