+297.3%
GLW vs DOCS
+50.6%
+246.7%
-59.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DOCS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.9% | -4.3% | -8.6% | -12.9% |
| 7D | -19.7% | -1.3% | -18.4% | -19.7% |
| 30D | -38.8% | +19.4% | -58.2% | -38.8% |
| 3M | -33.9% | +53.4% | -87.3% | -34.2% |
| 6M | -36.0% | +28.8% | -64.7% | -35.9% |
| YTD | +18.7% | -25.1% | +43.8% | +23.6% |
| 1Y | +19.8% | -48.1% | +67.9% | +29.1% |
| All | +297.3% | +50.6% | +246.7% | +292.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DOCS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DOCS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DOCS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DOCS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling